The WSJ, again, Rivkin and Casey edition. I could not get past their first sentence without feeling the urge to reply.
To start, they write: "The unfolding IRS scandal is a symptom, not the disease.For decades, campaign-finance reform zealots have sought to limit core political speech through spending limits and disclosure requirements. More recently, they have claimed that it is wrong and dangerous for tax-exempt entities to engage in political speech."
So, 'core' political speech is not, say, politicians speaking, but donor contributing money to campaigns? And I my tax dollars should subsidize the political work of a non-profit?
How are either of those beliefs conservative?
No comments:
Post a Comment